Slowly but surely I am making moves to build research networks that will support future grant applications. My working idea that I would like build research networks around is as follows: I’m interested in building a social modeling platform for researchers, Govt and industry stakeholders. The purpose is to model social information in order to identify social trends, polarisation and emergent forms of disruption from changing patterns of social organisation. The work focuses on building 3D interactive surfaces with a data visualization model constructed from archival, static and real-time social data streams. I’m using an environmental model of digital formations developing from my phd research to drive the analysis and shape the immersive 3D translations/transformation of social intelligence. Research themes include social cohesion, inclusion and change. This larger vision will need case studies from different perspectives. I am hoping to engage scholars across the social sciences, humanities, media and communication, computer sciences and architecture who are interested in the possible applications of this idea within their own domains of research. So watch this space and do get in contact if you’re interested in seeing where this goes. I will be using my social media analysis of public discourse surrounding crypto currencies as an initial case study through which to test and build up an approach.
Amazingly, I have a 20 minute window of unstructured time and I thought, is now the time that I pop up my head and reflect on the last period of time in my academic practice? You mean I can breathe for a moment and review what’s going on? Wow… that sounds good. So here we are.. or at the very least, here I am, at your writerly service.
I’ve been grinding under the rock of academic teaching, which has its joys, but also its challenges. Working in the Masters of Communication program at Deakin for my second year has allowed me to create and shape the units that I work with. This has been a wonderful experience in terms of influencing student’s learning, but also a huge undertaking with much learning about organisational engagement. Still, I’ve written my very first unit on research methods, Alexia styles. That has been fun.
In terms of research, my Cryptocurrency use study has lost momentum and my attention and is sadly languishing. I pine to return to the active practice of ethnographic field work and hope, that there will be a gap in my workload to priorities this project. What is happening in this space and where is the community imaging the next possibilities are coming from now that speculation and investment has created a bubble and drawn out the oxygen for imagining alternative financial practices that are more inclusive.
Under my rock is also the small pebble of future research directions, including the project idea that I’ve had bubbling along for some time about how to model social form and make interactive and reactive social surfaces that can be animated and used to understand and interpret social trends and currents.
Still further, I am taking small steps in learning how to work with social media data, do sentiment analysis and build up a applied toolkit for social media analysis using available software such as NLTK. These bits of learning are just small pieces of the puzzle to the future skill set that I see as necessary to build up interactive and dimensional models of social form.
In terms of writing, well, that suffers also under the grind the teaching practice. When do I have space to dream and breathe and wend words into stories that shape and reshape my world?
It’s sad to see projects that I am invested in and my writing practice languishing whilst I turn my attention to establishing financial security, professional development and gaining professional experience working within a university department. These things matter, but to what cost? This trade off is a balancing act and at some point I will need to give to the other sides of my creative practice. Right now, I am in a holding pattern acquiring skills and preparing for whatever next. What is next? Maybe I need to raise my periscope higher up.
Right, well that’s time up for now and I haven’t shared with you any of the creative writing or ideas that I have started to manifest. Here’s one of them, my piece for the Agile Opera research project called Mirror Play. It’s something I’m very proud of. Another piece of work that I’m proud of is a small blog piece that I’ve derived from the Silk Road research and have happily joined it to the development of a special issue for a journal with some wonderful crew. This is a reflection on some of the challenges and themes from this research project that haven’t yet had an appropriate channel through which to share them. In this blog I consider Silk Road as a Digital Bermuda Triangle. Enjoy.
You are invited to participate in a research project being conducted through RMIT University. The project title is: An ethnographic study of the use of Bitcoin
- Professor Supriya Singh, Professor, Sociology of Communications, RMIT.
- Professor Heather Horst, University of Sydney.
- Dr Greg Adamson, Global Chair, IEEE, Society for Social Implications of Technology, and University of Melbourne.
- Dr Alexia Maddox, Research Assistant, RMIT University and Deakin University.
Contact Alexia by email to find out more about the study: a dot maddox [at] deakin dot edu dot au
Who is involved in this research project? Why is it being conducted?
We are researchers primarily based at RMIT and are conducting an ethnographic study of Bitcoin use to understand how its social adoption reveals changing perspectives towards money and the associated conditions of trust, security and privacy within economic exchange in a cross-cultural context.
This research is being conducted because there is currently limited understanding of the role of Bitcoin, and cryptocurrencies more generally, as an alternative form of digital cash and its social adoption across diverse socio-cultural contexts.
The project has been approved by the RMIT Human Research Ethics Committee, Ethics number. BCHEAN 19717
Who would we like to talk with? (eligibility for the study)
By inviting you to participate, we anticipate that you have used Bitcoin and/or other cryptocurrencies to conduct online purchases or engaged in the technology through mining bitcoins. You may also have been actively engaged with the community surrounding the development and use of Bitcoins and are likely to support the agenda to promote the social adoption of Bitcoin and/or its associated technologies.
What is the project about? What are the questions being addressed?
This study is about gaining insight into the user experience and social practices surrounding Bitcoin in diverse social and cultural contexts. We also seek to understand the role of Bitcoin alongside people’s use of other currency forms, both digital and non-digital.
We will not be addressing questions about the illegal use of Bitcoin
For this study, we anticipate interviewing up to 50 people directly on their experiences of using Bitcoin and conducting participant observation over the course of 2017 at events and online forums where Bitcoin use is the primary focus. (the primary time period where we will be active is May 2017 to the end of July 2017
If I agree to participate, what will I be required to do?
The interview may take up to 30 minutes or longer depending on your availability and on what you have to say. It will be audio-recorded if you consent.
We will not be asking you about illegal uses of Bitcoin. We recommend that you do not share information about illegal activities with the researcher.
During the interview you will be asked about your experiences of using Bitcoin, starting with the question of what you use it for and why. We are also interested in your use of Bitcoin in relation to other types of money, both digital and non-digital. Throughout the discussion we’ll focus on your perspectives about the use of Bitcoin and where you see its advantages and limitations with regards to trust, privacy and security.
What are the possible risks or disadvantages?
We will be interviewing in a manner that will ensure there are no risks or disadvantages. We will only be asking about the use of Bitcoin for legal activities. You will not have to reveal discomforting facts or answer questions that you feel are uncomfortable.
What are the benefits associated with participation?
Your experience will contribute to the development of public awareness and knowledge surrounding the uses and applications of Bitcoin specifically, and cryptocurrencies more generally.
To symbolically acknowledge your contribution, we will transfer $2(AUD) worth of Bitcoin to your wallet upon completion of the interview.
What will happen to the information I provide?
The information you provide will remain confidential. We will use a pseudonym to refer to you. Identifying details will be masked. Any potentially identifying information that you provide, such as place or event names, will not be reported in these publications.
The information you provide will be kept in a secure environment for five years after publication before being destroyed. The privacy of the information you provide will be safeguarded through encryption practices and researcher confidentiality.
Any information that you provide can be disclosed only if (1) it is to protect you or others from harm, (2) if specifically required or allowed by law, or (3) you provide the researchers with written permission.
The results of the research will be collated and analysed in reports, journal articles and conference presentations, with a public archive of these becoming available through RMIT. We can also provide it to you at your request.
What are my rights as a participant?
- The right to withdraw from participation at any time
- The right to request that any recording cease
- The right to have any unprocessed data withdrawn and destroyed, provided it can be reliably identified, and provided that so doing does not increase the risk for the participant.
- The right to be de-identified in any photographs intended for public publication, before the point of publication
- The right to have any questions answered at any time.
Whom should I contact if I have any questions?
If you are concerned about your responses to any of the interview questions or if you find participation in the project distressing, you should contact Professor Supriya Singh as soon as convenient. Supriya will discuss your concerns with you confidentially and suggest appropriate follow-up, if necessary.
You can download this plain language statement and the consent forms here [pls-and-consent_bitcoin-study]
Thank you for your interest!
Fact is always stranger than fiction. In this meta escapade of seeking funding from the crowd for research into a decentralised digital cash, I am learning that the centralised structures of research institutions and banks are at odds with agility, responsiveness and action.
I feel the need to record my most recent learnings about doing crowdfunding and conducting this through a university, only I’m gobsmacked by the inertia and red tape.
The cryptocurrency use research has gone through research ethics (an eye opening adventure in itself). The idea is to do in person work alongside engaging and monitoring trends in the online environment. With a digital community, doing both these activities is a no brainer. However methodologically, this brings two apparently uncomfortable bedfellows into one bed. It involves face-to-face and online observation and interaction. Doing both appears to throw ethics committees into conniptions. The learning here is don’t take quotes from public forums without consent. It will mean that every researcher who comes after you will suffer at multiple ethics amendments as the committee remembers the massive shitstorm this created and makes every researcher who comes after you jump through a thousand hoops.
So. That hurdle passed and there’s no more funding to do the data collection.
Multiple months later and I’ve cleared the decks to start the project. Now, I’m attempting my first crowdfunding campaign.
Donate now and help me make a cool and cutting edge project happen. It makes me excited, and that’s saying something. My research antenna is twanging like ships ropes singing in a storm.
It appears that not only do I need to learn how to video edit, but I also need to work out how to reach the right people and work out the research product to sell the project. All very grown up stuff.
So thanks to a lovely fairy, I now have something to say on that front. 50Usd gets you a research report and a handwritten cover note. I apologise in advance that my handwriting is barely legible. There’s also likely to be a cheeky little sketch because that’s just how I roll. From there we get more sophisticated. 250usd is a tailored report and follow up. 500usd is a consult and report where we get to talk. The lucky donar gets to place the spotlight on a particular area and I get to share what we’ve learnt about the topic. For 1000usd it’s even more fun. 1/2 day workshop responding to the donar’s case study, drawing on the research findings.
If the crowdfunding campaign doesn’t get off the ground for a variety of real and contributing factors (such as time of year, finding sponsors or the failure of the university to support the campaign), then these ideas alone will see the project happen.
In all of this, I stand observing. I see chaos, opportunity and the brittle nature of centralised structures. I take note of the entrepreneurial spirit of digital frontiers where the future recombines itself in the inner fringes.
In this spirit I repeat my mantra: Always walk towards the doors that open. Don’t waste your time with what you don’t want and pursue what you do want however you can.
It’s always uncanny when disparate activities align, both through the loose tendrils of online presence and the digital traces of research activity. I’m currently running a crowdfunding campaign for an ethnography of bitcoin use. Which you can find here:
How this campaign and opportunity came about is the interesting bit. As with all good ideas, one thing lead to another…
Prior to this study, I collaborated on a study of the impacts of cyryptomarkets upon drug use trajectories (through NDRI, Curtin University) (2013-2015). During that study, I presented preliminary findings and conducted a member check (a methodological approach to verifying social findings) with the Bitcoin community. You can still find the YouTube recording of this, which we made so that the cryptomarket community also had access to these early activities online.
Cryptomarket drug sales were facilitated by Bitcoin and this was my first exposure to the cryptocurrency and the community ethos surrounding this innovation. The Bitcoin community was a homologous (legal) community that I could check my early understandings and observations with. However, they themselves proved to be fascinating in how they were using technological innovations to disrupt the financial sector and I have stayed connected in the hope that I would be able to work with them in the future.
More recently, I had been looking into crowdfunding as a research funding activity over 2016. As an early career researcher, I needed to build a funding track record but was in the precarious position of short-term contract affiliations with universities and couldn’t apply for funding. So like the focus of the study, there is an issue of financial inclusion here for me. After a hiatus working for Deakin Library to establish some financial stability and continuity, I made the call to return to part-time research and my personal passion for studying the formation of digital community in frontier spaces. Simultaneously, I was approached by a crowdfunding platform, https://experiment.com, to join a network security challenge based upon my research publication from the Silk Road research. At the time, we had taken the Bitcoin study from a research proposal through to ethics approval, but it was languishing as an unfunded project.
The invitation to develop a crowdfunding campaign came at the same time that I had decided to relaunch the project based upon my personal passion for this topic. The combination of these two events with the opportunities they presented to get the Bitcoin study off the ground was a moment of serendipitous alignment. Because the Bitcoin use study is about a decentralised peer-to-peer payment system, I felt that this worked with the logic of a crowdfunding campaign and could engage the community to support the project as an additional angle.
In addition to this, engaging the different stakeholders and audiences through social media and news media outreach requires time, attention, presence and social media knowledge. These can be challenges for many researchers who are not adept in the environment and may require skill development. Whilst the success percentages are higher for crowdfunding campaigns (despite their all or nothing criteria), the effort required to run them can be the same or more as it takes to apply for central block funding that may support larger sums of money. With a project such as the Bitcoin study, which is in its early days, however, the logic and opportunity provided by crowdfunding to reach and engage the relevant communities is worth the effort as it will spill over into increasing our opportunities to connect with and do ethnography amongst the cryptocurrency community.
The skills that I have needed to develop for this project have included producing and editing a short video that will translate well and widely in the social media environment. This video is available on the crowdfunding page and appears to be a crucial element in the success of a campaign. The other learning curve has been the inclusion of the cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, as a donation option. This has been an interesting experience, one that I considered necessary considering that I would like to engage the cryptocurrency community in supporting and participating in this research. One of the key points for the campaign is that it is an all or nothing funding strategy, so all pledged donations need to be returnable if the campaign does not reach its funding goal. The crew at the experiment has worked with me to make this possible for bitcoin, which is a payment system where the payment is designed not to be reversed (!!!). Ironic that.
If you’re interested in participating in or learning more about the scope and approach of the research, you can download the plain language statement (and consent forms) here: pls-and-consent_bitcoin-study. Essentially, we’re interested in: people’s uses for bitcoin alongside other digital and “non-digital” currencies (aka fiat currencies), business uses and applications for cryptocurrencies, the possibilities of cryptocurrencies within trade finance and international remittances and the role(s) that cryptocurrencies may play during large scale political and economic instability (such as in India where demonetisation is happening, during Brexit and in response to the presidential election in the US).
This study has been a long time in the works and I am excited to invite you to be curious and watch this space. Through RMIT, and in collaboration with Professor Supriya Singh, Professor Heather Horst and Dr Greg Adamson, I am launching an ethnographic study of bitcoin use.
Bitcoin is a digital cash, exchanged through a peer-to-peer payment system, that is designed to bypass state controls and operate outside of the banking system. We are interested in whether this online currency may support financial inclusion and how its use impacts the conditions of trust, security and privacy of money.
For this study, we are conducting an ethnography to provide detailed insights into the social experience, motivations and perspectives that people hold in using Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. You can read more about our research directions for this study in our recently published article, “An ethnography of Bitcoin; towards a future research agenda” .
The preliminary study will run for three months, starting from January 2017.
The ethnography will be conducted across the environments where bitcoin use and discussion about its use are “native”. This means that we will be engaging in online environments as well as attending events and meetings where cryptocurrency use, such as Bitcoin, is the primary focus.
We anticipate interviewing up to 50 people, including key community members, on their experiences of using Bitcoin. Here is the link where you can download a pdf of the plain language statement for the study here (pls-and-consent_bitcoin-study). It describes what the interviews will cover and provides the consent form.
Why are we doing this study now? This research is being conducted because there is currently limited understanding of the use of Bitcoin, and cryptocurrencies more generally, across diverse socio-cultural contexts. It is timely because alternative payment systems gain more appeal during periods of economic instability and resulting waves of political backlash from disaffected groups.
As we are based in Melbourne, Australia, we will start here, but will also attend events wherever we end up over the course of 2017. This will include other major cities in Australia, but is also likely to include major cities in the US, such as New York, London (UK), major cities in India and potentially a couple of locations Africa.
This study is currently unfunded, however if you would like to support the project, I have launched a crowdfunding campaign over at the Experiment where you can donate. This campaign will run for the month of January (2017) and I hope to gain financial support to do the data collection. From this seed funding and early findings, we will then be able to make a case for furthering this study to the global scale and scope that it deserves.
- (For supervisors) From your experience and what you see happening in the field, what are some of the key methods and skills PhD students should be including in their approaches?
- (For postgraduate students) What digital methods and types of content (i.e. software spaces, algorithms, relational data from social media, textual content from forum or blog analysis), have you become interested in pursuing to answer your research questions?
- (For practitioners) what training needs have you identified in the workplace that could become a part of the education pathway for researchers and practitioners drawing on this field?
- What are some particular considerations that you have had to address in your own research and how did you address them?
- What body of literature do you draw on to assist you with these questions?
- What roadblocks and challenges have you experienced when working with this data in a professional context (transparency and privacy considerations).
- (for supervisors) what are the questions and considerations you have encountered from PhD students wishing to conduct research using digital methods and questions that investigate our digital lives?
- (for post graduates) What do you wish your supervisor could provide in terms of support or mentorship when you have sought to do research in the digital domain (through methods or questions of our digital lives)?